Monthly Archives: September 2019

New Housing Options for the 50+ Generation.

 

CAROLE MCMANUS Articles for FinanceArticles for LifestyleCommunityHousingResearchResourcesSurveyTRENDS

A NEXT FOR ME MARKET REPORT

This quarter, Next for Me partnered on a housing survey with Silvernest, an online home sharing platform that pairs boomers, retirees, empty nesters and other older adults with compatible housemates for long-term rent arrangements.

Our survey was conducted with Next for Me and Silvernest subscribers in the United States who are between the ages of 40 – 65+.

The majority (35%) were single, with an additional 16% reporting they are divorced, 9% widowed

Responses came from the South (19%), the Midwest (19%), and North East (16%), but the majority (40%) were from the West

36% do not have housing plans post-retirement

Boomers now represent the fastest-growing segment of adults in the market for roommates, according to SpareRoom.com. Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies reports that in 2017, 1.9 percent of people age 65 and over resided with a roommate or housemate, up from 1.3 percent in 2006. One of the fastest-growing household types in the coming decade will be empty nesters and older singles, totaling 11.1 million additional households age 65 and over.

Although 50% of Boomers say they want to age in place, there are a number of factors that may make it difficult, starting with financial:

49% of our survey respondents say they don’t or “probably don’t” have enough money saved to cover their mortgage or housing expenses in retirement

That doesn’t take into account not-so-extraordinary circumstances like later-in-life “Grey Divorce”, which is likely to take a serious toll on both spouse’s financial health. Factor in loneliness and the safety and accessibility concerns that come with aging, and you get a demographic that is increasingly open to the idea of home sharing.

The 65+ population is growing daily, and more and more of them are putting off retirement, either by choice or out of financial necessity. This aging population will need accessible housing, and those who are financially unprepared will need to find new ways of reducing their housing costs.

The full report “New Housing Options for the 50+ Generation” is included in our annual research subscription. As a subscriber you receive quarterly trends reporting and calls with our editors.

You may be wise to consider home equity loan, says MoneyWatch

According to a recent brief from the Boston College Center for Retirement Research (CRR), middle-class Americans age 65 to 69 have more or equal wealth in their home equity than in their financial assets. (For this purpose, middle class is defined as the middle 60 percent based on total wealth.) Yet few retirees are taking steps to utilize this significant asset to help them finance their retirement.

The CRR brief said downsizing is the main way retirees tap home equity. Yet it also cites a study that found only 30 percent of homeowners approaching retirement move and that more retirees move to a home that’s more expensive than the one they left. Those who do move to a less-expensive home generally do so in response to a negative financial shock, such as high medical expenses, the need for daily or medical assistance (precipitating a move to assisted living or a nursing home) or widowhood.

Trending News

Lost AirPods cost consumers more than half a billion dollars annually

Suit alleges Intuit duped low-income taxpayers to pay for free help

Out of fashion at H&M: Brazilian leather tied to Amazon fires

Food giants like Tyson and Kellogg’s want bite of fake-meat market

Another way to tap home equity is through a federal government-insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage that’s available to homeowners age 62 and older, commonly known as a reverse mortgage. Despite its availability, only about 2 percent of eligible homeowners have taken out a reverse mortgage. Cost is cited as the most common impediment, although reverse mortgages gained a bad reputation in the past for many other reasons.

However, retirement researcher Wade Pfau’s book ”How to Use Reverse Mortgages to Secure Your Retirement” does an excellent job clearing up some of the common misconceptions about reverse mortgages:

High costs. Just like conventional mortgages, reverse mortgages have both up-front and closing costs that can be reduced by shopping around for competitive lenders. If a reverse mortgage is the best or only way to buy your retirement freedom, it might be well worth the cost.

Family misunderstandings. Given stories about angry children who thought they were inheriting a mortgage-free home, some older homeowners are reluctant to burden their children. A carefully designed strategy using a reverse mortgage, however, has the potential to increase the total legacy to adult children, or it can help prevent the unwanted legacy of a retired parent who has run out of money and needs to move with an adult child.

Home title. It’s simply not true that the lender owns the title of a home with a reverse mortgage. The homeowners keep the title and aren’t required to pay off the debt until they move or die. Heirs also have the right to keep the house and pay off the debt.

Desperate borrowers. Some borrowers spend the proceeds of a reverse mortgage too quickly or can’t keep up with required property taxes, insurance and maintenance. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development now requires a counseling session for potential borrowers and has enacted rules to discourage taking too much debt too soon from a reverse mortgage.

Nonborrowing spouses. In the past, spouses younger than age 62 were taken off the home title to allow a reverse mortgage to proceed. Then they were surprised when the borrower died and they had to immediately repay the loan or leave the home. But in 2015, new protections were put in place for nonborrowing spouses: They can remain on the home title and stay in the home even after the borrowing spouse has passed away, without having to immediately repay the loan.

Reverse mortgage expert Shelley Giordano’s book, ”What’s the Deal with Reverse Mortgages?” describes four reverse mortgage “nevers” to help alleviate common misconceptions:

You never give up title to your home.

You never owe more than your house is worth.

You never have to leave your home as long as you maintain the property, the taxes on it and the home’s insurance.

You never have to make loan repayments in advance of leaving the home unless you choose to do so.

Pfau’s book explores several viable uses for a reverse mortgage, such as using it to:

Generate a lifetime monthly paycheck that supplements Social Security and other financial resources, like an annuity.

Provide payments for a fixed period to pay for living expenses while you’re delaying Social Security as a purposeful strategy to optimize that benefit.

Pay off a conventional mortgage to reduce monthly housing expenses.

Fund remodeling costs that help you age in place.

Create a liquid asset through a reverse mortgage line of credit that can be tapped for emergencies or that grows to be used late in life for medical or long-term care expenses.

Pay for premiums for long-term care insurance.

Design a strategy to reduce “sequence of returns” risk with invested assets. With this strategy, when the stock market drops, you tap the reverse mortgage line of credit for living expenses, which buys time to allow invested assets to recover. After the market rebounds, you can switch back to withdrawing from your invested assets.

Pay for living expenses if your financial assets become depleted.

Pfau’s book contains analyses that show it’s best to take out a reverse mortgage line of credit early in your retirement, before you might start tapping it.

Of course, reverse mortgages aren’t for everybody, particularly if you don’t plan to stay in your home for many more years. In this case, it may not be worth incurring the up-front expenses.

On the other hand, if you have substantial home equity, if your financial resources aren’t sufficient to enable you to retire and if you really want to retire, you’d be wise to explore all of your options to deploy your home equity. The two books mentioned above are great resources to help you get started.

These two books are featured on these pages. See below:

Understanding Reverse Mortgages: An Interview with Shelley Giordano

What the Critics Get Wrong About (HECM) Reverse Mortgages

 

 

 

Live Well Without Running Out of Money in Retirement — How do you measure up?

By EILEEN AMBROSE, Senior Editor and SANDRA BLOCK, Senior Editor
August 29, 2019
From Kiplinger’s Personal Finance

As you near retirement, you might look back and think that saving for this next stage of life was the easy part. During your working years, the big decisions were how much to save and where to invest. But now it’s time to switch gears. Instead of accumulating assets, you must figure out how to turn your nest egg into an income stream to last a lifetime.

SEE ALSO:15 Reasons You’ll Go Broke in Retirement

“The idea of withdrawing from their retirement portfolio is really painful for a lot of people. They’re savers,” says John Bohnsack, a certified financial planner in College Station, Texas.

Here are steps that can help you generate the retirement income you will need. Along the way, you’ll need to answer some questions: Will you get a part-time job in retirement that brings in some income? When should you claim Social Security or start taking your pension, if you have one? And how will you address the big uncertainties of health care and long-term care? Taxes will get more complicated because, unlike previous generations, most retirees today have the bulk of their retirement money tied up in tax-deferred 401(k)s and traditional IRAs. How do you withdraw from these accounts safely without triggering a big tax bill?

Begin With a Budget

Get a handle on what your annual expenses will be in retirement by creating a retirement budget. Frank Castello, a 66-year-old former IT manager from Bowie, Md., gave his retirement budget a test run before leaving the workforce in 2016. He drew up a spreadsheet with his anticipated expenses, calculating that he would need $4,000 a month to live on. He lived on that budget for two years before retiring, while also maxing out his 401(k) and boosting his savings outside the plan. “I was constantly refiguring, rejiggering, verifying and validating the numbers,” says Castello. “Do I have it right? Will I have enough? You don’t know for sure until you live it.”

So far, it’s worked out for him. Castello, who isn’t married, lives on savings and a $1,490 monthly pension. He rolled his 401(k) into an IRA that is 63% invested in stocks, with the rest mostly in bonds—an account he hasn’t touched yet. He has enough cash on hand to pay expenses for a few years without having to worry about stock market fluctuations, and he has set up an emergency fund that he might need to tap when his 2005 Acura TL finally gives out. And Castello is waiting until age 70 to claim Social Security to get the maximum benefit. “I’m healthy. I don’t need the money now,” he says.

Take a look at what you’ve spent in the past year. (If you don’t track your expenses now, your credit card issuers may offer a year-end summary of your charges to get you started.) Then adjust those expenses for what might change in retirement. For instance, you won’t be commuting to work anymore, but you might be traveling to more far-flung destinations.

Or you might decide to tackle some major home renovations. “I always joke with clients, ‘Look around your house and see what you want to change and start planning for it,’” says Nicole Strbich, a CFP in Alexandria, Va. Because once you retire, you’re going to sit in your living room and decide you need new carpet, a kitchen renovation and a bigger porch, she says. (Renovations often end up costing more than projected, so Strbich advises doing them just before retiring, while you still have a paycheck to cover any surprise bills.)

Take a look at what you’ve spent in the past year … Then adjust those expenses for what might change in retirement.

Don’t overlook health care surprises, either, especially if you plan to retire early. Judy Freedman of Marlton, N.J., retired six years ago as a group director in global communications at Campbell Soup. Too young for Medicare—she’s now 61—Freedman pays more than $1,000 a month for the retiree medical plan through her former employer. And though she has a dental policy that covers the basics, such as teeth cleaning, expensive dental work has to be paid out of pocket. (After you sign up for Medicare, you’ll need a supplemental policy to provide dental coverage.) Before retiring, Freedman, a widow, cut her expenses by downsizing. She sold her three-bedroom ranch house on a large lot and moved into a townhouse community, which reduced her property taxes, utilities and landscaping bills.

Once you’ve nailed down your anticipated expenses, subtract all your expected guaranteed sources of income, such as a pension, annuity and Social Security. (You can get an estimate of your future Social Security benefit by opening an online account at www.ssa.gov/myaccount.) The result is how much you will need to withdraw from your portfolio to maintain your lifestyle in retirement.

Make Withdrawals Last as Long as You Do

What if your expenses outpace your sources of income, meaning you’re likely to deplete your nest egg too quickly? In that case, you may need to consider working longer or go back to your retirement budget and figure out what expenses you can cut.

But knowing whether you’re withdrawing money too quickly from your nest egg can be tricky: You don’t know how many years you’ll live in retirement, and you can’t count on earning the returns that we’ve enjoyed in the decade-long bull market. “If you do it in a careful and measured way, you can make withdrawals and, even if your account drops in value, not necessarily run out of money,” says Tim Steffen, director of advanced planning for Baird in Milwaukee.

One popular guideline has been the 4% rule, which was designed in the 1990s as a safe withdrawal rate for a 30-year retirement that may include bear markets and periods of high inflation. It assumes half of your retirement portfolio is in stocks and the other half is in bonds and cash.

SEE ALSO:10 Things You’ll Spend More on in Retirement

The rule works like this: Retirees draw 4% from their portfolio in the first year of retirement. Then they adjust the dollar amount annually by the previous year’s rate of inflation. So with a $1 million portfolio, your withdrawal in your first year of retirement would be $40,000. If inflation that year goes up 3%, the next year’s withdrawal would be $41,200. If inflation then drops to 2%, the withdrawal for the following year would be $42,024.

The 4% rule is a good starting point but may need some fine-tuning to fit your own situation, says Maria Bruno, head of U.S. wealth planning research at Vanguard. “Are you retiring at a younger age? If so, you might need a lower withdrawal rate.” You may also need to withdraw your money more slowly if you are investing more conservatively, she adds.

Michael Kitces, director of wealth management at Pinnacle Advisory in Columbia, Md., says that while the 4% rule protects portfolios under bad-case scenarios, retirees could experience the opposite and end up after 30 years with more than double what they started with—even after decades of withdrawals. He suggests that if you use the rule, you review your portfolio every three years. Anytime it rises 50% above the starting point—say, a $1 million portfolio grows to $1.5 million—increase the dollar amount you withdraw that year by 10%. Then you can resume increasing that dollar amount by the rate of inflation until your portfolio grows significantly again to warrant a raise. (Of course, if you want to leave a legacy for your heirs, you may want to keep your money invested.)

Manage Your Portfolio

Inflation is relatively low today, but even at current rates, it can greatly erode your purchasing power over a long retirement. And the Consumer Price Index, the most popular gauge of inflation, may be undercounting your expenses in retirement. The CPI-E, a government index that gauges the rise in prices for households age 62 and older, averaged 1.86% annually over the past decade, slightly higher than the general inflation rate. That’s because older households devote more of their budget to health care, and the cost of that has risen faster than the general inflation rate.

To keep up with inflation, your portfolio will need the kind of long-term growth that stocks can provide. The right amount for you depends on how much risk your nerves can handle, along with your other assets and sources of income. If you’re near retirement or newly retired, Vanguard’s Bruno recommends a diversified portfolio with 40% to 60% in stocks.

Are you retiring at a younger age? If so, you might need a lower withdrawal rate. You may also need to withdraw your money more slowly if you’re investing more conservatively.

Investors may have grown complacent in a bull market that’s now close to being in its 11th year, but a bear is inevitable. Given the long run of this bull market, there is an elevated risk of a bear on the horizon, says Kitces.

A bear market can be devastating if it strikes early in retirement and you are forced to sell investments at a loss to pay bills. One way to lessen the impact of this, says Kitces, is to reduce your exposure to stocks as you head into retirement. If you’re, say, 50% in stocks, reduce that to 40% or 30%, he says. When the market falls, you can use that opportunity to buy stocks at lower prices and boost your holdings back to 50% of your portfolio, he says.

Another way to protect yourself during a market downturn—and preserve your peace of mind—is to use the bucket system. You divide your money into three buckets based on when you’ll need it. Bucket One holds enough cash for living expenses in the first one or two years of retirement that won’t be covered by a pension, an annuity or Social Security. Bucket Two is made up of money you won’t need for the next 10 years and can be invested in, say, short- and intermediate-term bond funds. Bucket Three is the money you won’t need until much later, so it can be invested in stocks or even alternative investments, such as real estate or commodities. (Review your cash bucket annually to see if it needs to be replenished from one of the other buckets.)

With the bucket system, even if the stock market plummets, you have the comfort of knowing that you have enough money in the first two buckets to cover your expenses for years without selling your stocks for a loss (see Make Your Money Last).

Plan for Health Care

Vanguard’s research last year estimated that the typical 65-year-old woman pays $5,200 annually in health costs, including Medicare premiums and other out-of-pocket medical expenses. The cost nearly doubles by age 85, to $10,100 annually. “Health care is the biggest wild card,” says Elliot Herman, a CFP in Quincy, Mass. The only sure thing about it is that the cost will rise over time.

SEE ALSO:Retirees, Avoid These 11 Costly Medicare Mistakes

To help with medical bills in re­tirement, consider opening a health savings account while you’re still working, if you have a high-deductible health insurance policy. “We sometimes say an HSA is a Roth on steroids,” says Vanguard’s Bruno. You get a triple tax-free benefit: Contributions aren’t taxed, they grow tax-deferred, and the money can be used tax-free for eligible medical expenses. And recent changes in HSA rules for those with chronic conditions make these accounts even more attractive.

For 2019, you can contribute up to $3,500 if you have single coverage and as much as $7,000 for family coverage. To make the most of the HSA, pay current medical bills out of pocket (if you can afford to), so the account has more time to grow. You can’t contribute to an HSA once you enroll in Medicare, even if you’re still working, but you can use the money at any time to pay medical bills, including Medicare Part B and Part D premiums.

Long-term care, which isn’t covered by Medicare, is another uncertainty that retirees need to address. You may never need long-term care, but if you do, the bill can be huge. A study by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimated that nearly half of people who are now 65—or who reached that age in the past few years—won’t have any long-term-care costs. But one-fourth are expected to face long-term-care bills of up to $100,000, and 15% will rack up costs of $250,000 or more.

If you have the assets, you could pay the bills out of pocket. Long-term-care insurance is also an option, although it can be expensive, and you may have a difficult time finding a policy if you have a health issue (see How to Afford Long-Term Care).

Kitces advises buying a policy while you’re in your fifties, when the cost is lower and you’re likely still healthy enough to qualify for a policy. Policies are much more expensive than those issued many years ago, but the higher price also reduces the risk of steep rate hikes in the future, says Kitces.

Long-term care, which isn’t covered by Medicare, is another uncertainty that retirees need to address. You may never need it, but if you do, the bill can be huge.

Some people resist buying long-term-care insurance, thinking it will be a waste of money if they never need care, says Keith Bernhardt, vice president of retirement income at Fidelity Investments. The solution for them, he says, can be a hybrid policy that combines long-term-care and life insurance benefits. It will cover bills for long-term care, but if you never need care (or need only little of it) your heirs will receive a death benefit when you die. “It helps to remove that concern that ‘I won’t get a benefit from this,’ ” Bernhardt says. Be aware that the policy is doing double-duty, so premiums are significantly higher than if you purchased a stand-alone long-term-care policy. An independent insurance broker can help you find a policy among different companies.

Getting Guaranteed Income

A traditional pension will provide guaranteed income for life. Although more than 80% of state and local government workers have access to a pension, only about 17% of private-sector workers can access that type of retirement plan, according to the Alliance for Lifetime Income, a nonprofit that represents insurance companies and other financial institutions.

If you’re not in the fortunate group, an immediate annuity provides a way to create your own pension, using money you’ve saved in your 401(k) or elsewhere. In exchange for a lump sum, an insurance company will provide you with a monthly payment, usually for the rest of your life. Variable and equity-indexed annuities can also provide guaranteed income in retirement, but the amount may fluctuate depending on the performance of an underlying investment portfolio. These annuities are more complex than immediate annuities and often come with high fees.

A popular strategy is to buy an immediate annuity that will cover your monthly expenses, such as utilities and food. If a bear market hits, you’ll have the flexibility to wait until the stock market recovers before taking withdrawals from your portfolio (although you may have to postpone your winter Caribbean island cruise).

There are downsides to annuities to consider before you write a check. Once you give an insurance company your money, you usually can’t get it back, although some insurance companies allow one-time withdrawals for certain emergencies. Another drawback is that inflation will erode the value of your payments over time. Most insurance companies offer immediate annuities with an inflation rider—for example, payments will increase by 3% a year—but that will lower your initial payouts by up to 28%. For example, if a 65-year-old man invested $100,000 in a New York Life immediate annuity with no inflation rider, he would receive $6,197 a year. If he added a 3% annual inflation adjustment, his first annual payout would be only $4,446.

SEE ALSO:How Well Do You Really Understand Annuities?

An even greater concern is the impact of interest rates on your payouts. Two factors affect the amount of income you receive from an immediate annuity: your age (the older you are, the higher your payouts) and interest rates. When interest rates are low, payouts are depressed, too.

Payouts are usually tied to rates for 10-year Treasuries, and that rate is historically low, says Harold Evensky, a certified financial planner and chairman of Evensky and Katz/Foldes Financial. Evensky believes a low-cost immediate annuity makes sense for a lot of retirees but that this may not be a good time to invest in one. Waiting will provide two benefits, he says: You’ll be older, which means higher payouts, and there’s a good chance that interest rates will be higher in the future than they are now.

If you’re worried that interest rates could go lower—or you’d like to start receiving at least some guaranteed income now—consider building an annuity ladder. With this strategy, you spread the amount you want to invest in an immediate annuity over several years. For example, if you want to invest $200,000, you would buy an annuity for $50,000 this year and another $50,000 every two years until you have spent the entire amount. If rates rise, you’ll be able to capture them, and if they fall, you’ll have locked in payments at the higher rate.

Another option that requires a smaller outlay of cash is a deferred annuity, also known as a longevity annuity. With this annuity, you get guaranteed payments when you reach a certain age. For example, a 65-year-old man who invests $100,000 in a deferred annuity that starts payments when he turns 80 would receive about $1,850 a month, according to ImmediateAnnuities.com.

Two factors affect the amount of income you receive from an immediate annuity: your age (the older you are, the higher your payouts) and interest rates.

You can invest up to 25% of your IRA or 401(k) account (or $130,000, whichever is less) in a type of longevity annuity known as a qualified longevity annuity contract (QLAC) without having to take required minimum distributions when you turn 70½. Deferred annuity payouts are also tied to interest rates, so if you believe rates are going to rise, you may want to postpone investing in one of these annuities.

Depending on the type of retirement plan you have, you may already own an annuity. Many teachers and other public service employees have variable annuities in their 403(b) retirement savings plans. These annuities invest in mutual funds and can be converted into an annuity that provides income in retirement.

Legislation pending in Congress would make it easier for 401(k) plan providers to offer annuities to plan participants by eliminating some of the liability risks for the employer. The legislation would also make these annuities portable, allowing job changers to transfer annuities to another employer’s plan or an IRA without paying surrender charges.

Supporters of the law say it would help workers convert their savings into lifetime payouts when they retire. But critics say the legislation doesn’t go far enough to prevent employers from offering complex variable and equity-indexed annuities that are burdened with high fees—a common problem with many 403(b) annuity offerings. You may be better off investing your savings in low-cost mutual funds or exchange-traded funds and buying an immediate or deferred annuity after you retire.

Your Home as a Safety Net

Reverse mortgages have often been branded as a way for older retirees to raise money only when other sources of retirement income have dried up. But a growing group of financial planners and academics say that taking out a reverse mortgage early in retirement could help protect your retirement income from stock market volatility and significantly reduce the risk that you’ll run out of money.

Here’s how the strategy, known as a standby reverse mortgage, works: Take out a reverse mortgage line of credit as early as possible—homeowners are eligible at age 62—and set it aside. If the stock market turns bearish, draw from the line of credit to
pay expenses until your portfolio recovers. Retirees who adopt this strategy should be able to avoid the pitfalls of the Great Recession, when many seniors were forced to take money out of severely depressed portfolios to pay the bills.

The standby reverse mortgage strategy can be effective “both from a practical and a behavioral perspective,” says Evensky. “If people know they’ve got resources when the market collapses, they don’t panic and sell.”

A traditional home-equity line of credit could also provide a source of emergency cash, but you can’t count on the money being there when you need it, says Shelley Giordano, founder of the Academy for Home Equity in Financial Planning at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.

SEE ALSO:The Reverse Mortgage Quiz: Test Your Knowledge

During the 2008–09 market downturn and credit crunch, many banks froze or closed borrowers’ home-equity lines. “Just when people needed money and liquidity, the banks needed liquidity, too,” says Giordano. That won’t happen if you have a reverse mortgage line of credit. As long as you meet the terms of the reverse mortgage—you must maintain your home and pay taxes and insurance—your line of credit is guaranteed.

Several factors make a standby reverse mortgage particularly attractive now. Homeowners age 62 and older have seen the amount of equity in their homes increase sharply in recent years, to a record $7.14 trillion in the first quarter of 2019, according to the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association.

Low interest rates are another plus. Under the terms of the government-insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, the most popular kind of reverse mortgage, the lower the interest rate, the more home equity you’re allowed to borrow.

Which leads us to one of the most counterintuitive—and potentially lucrative—features of reverse mortgages. Your untapped credit line will increase as if you were paying interest on the balance, even though you don’t have to pay interest on money you don’t tap. If interest rates increase—and given current low rates, they are almost guaranteed to move higher eventually—your line of credit will grow even faster, says Giordano.

You won’t have to pay back money you tap as long as you remain in your home, a comforting thought if you take money during a bear market. A HECM reverse mortgage is a “non-recourse” loan, which means the amount you or your heirs owe when the home is sold will never exceed the value of the home. For example, if your loan balance grows to $300,000 and your home is sold for $220,000, you (or your heirs) will never owe more than $220,000. The Federal Housing Administration insurance will reimburse the lender for the difference.

If you have an existing mortgage, you’ll have to use the proceeds from your reverse mortgage to pay that off first. You have plenty of flexibility: Funds left over can be taken as a line of credit, a lump sum, monthly payments or a combination of those options. Even if there’s not a lot of money left over, paying off your first mortgage means you won’t have to withdraw money to make mortgage payments during a market downturn, Giordano says. “A regular mortgage that requires a monthly principal and interest payment can be a real burden, especially when the value of your portfolio is under stress,” she says.

Under the terms of the government-insured Home Equity Conversion Mortgage, the lower the interest rate, the more home equity you’re allowed to borrow.

The drawbacks. One of the biggest downsides to reverse mortgages is the up-front cost, which is significantly higher than the cost of a traditional home-equity line of credit. The FHA says lenders can charge an origination fee equal to the greater of $2,500 or 2% of your home’s value (up to the first $200,000), plus 1% of the amount over $200,000, up to a cap of $6,000. You’ll also be charged an up-front mortgage insurance premium equal to 2% of your home’s appraised value or the FHA lending limit of $726,525, whichever is less. And you’ll have to pay third parties for an appraisal, title search and other services. You can pay for some of these costs with the proceeds from your loan, but that will reduce the loan balance. Costs vary, so talk to at least three lenders that offer reverse mortgages, says Giordano.

Because of the up-front costs, it’s rarely a good idea to take out a reverse mortgage unless you expect to stay in your home for at least five years. Remember, too, that the loan will come due when the last surviving borrower sells, leaves for more than 12 months due to illness, or dies.

If your heirs want to keep the home, they’ll need to pay off the loan first. That may not sit well with children who expect to inherit the family homestead, so it’s a good idea to discuss your plans with them in advance. Giordano doesn’t see this as a big barrier to a standby reverse mortgage—especially if it helps you preserve other, more liquid assets. “Kids would much rather split up a big fat portfolio than try to decide how to split up the house,” she says.

Yes, this new phase of life comes with a lot of uncertainties. And financial advisers say that many new retirees often hold back on spending because of all the unknown bills that may await years down the line. But Fidelity’s Bernhardt says these retirees often discover a happy surprise.

“They actually find out that they are in a pretty good spot. They are able to be happy and enjoy retirement,” he says. “It’s not quite as expensive as they thought it was going to be.”

Tax-Smart Strategies

The conventional wisdom to minimize taxes in retirement is to draw first from taxable accounts, which are generally taxed at favorable long-term capital gains tax rates (as low as zero but no higher than 23.8%); then tap tax-deferred accounts, such as traditional IRAs and 401(k)s, whose withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income; and dip into Roth IRAs last so this tax-free money has more time to grow.

SEE ALSO:State-by-State Guide to Taxes on Retirees

But if you’re approaching retirement with the bulk of your assets in a 401(k) or traditional IRA, consider a slight break with convention. The IRS requires you to begin minimum withdrawals from tax-deferred accounts after age 70½—so it can finally start collecting income taxes on the money. (Legislation pending in Congress would raise that age to 72.) But if your balances are large enough, these mandatory withdrawals could throw you into a higher tax bracket.

“The crop of retirees that are leaving the workforce today is the RMDgeneration,” says Maria Bruno, head of U.S. wealth planning research at Vanguard. “These are folks leaving the workforce with large tax-deferred balances.”

It’s not too late to reduce future RMDs if you’re still in your sixties. “We call this the sweet spot,” says Bruno. One tax strategy is to draw from tax-deferred accounts early in retirement, when you might be in a lower tax bracket, and use the money to help with living expenses while delaying Social Security. Or, if you don’t need the cash to live on, you can gradually convert some tax-deferred money into a Roth IRA.

In either case, make sure you don’t withdraw or convert too much money in a single year and push yourself into a higher tax bracket. It’s a good idea to visit an accountant or financial adviser to make sure you don’t trigger any un­intended tax consequences.

How to Get More From a Smaller Pie

The Society of Actuaries and the Stanford Center on Longevity have developed a withdrawal strategy geared for middle-income workers with less than $1 million in savings—people who often don’t work with financial advisers. This Spend Safely in Retirement Strategy relies on optimizing Social Security benefits, which ideally you would delay until age 70. “That’s the cornerstone of the strategy,” says Steve Vernon, research scholar at the Stanford Center on Longevity and author of Retirement Game-Changers.

Social Security retirement benefits can start as early as 62, but taking them that early will reduce your monthly check by up to 30% compared with waiting until your full retirement age (66½ for those turning 62 this year). And for every year you delay benefits past your full retirement age, your benefit grows by 8%. Few retirees (only 4%) delay Social Security until age 70, according to a new study that calculated that today’s retirees are losing out on an average of $111,000 per household during retirement by claiming benefits early.

Vernon acknowledges that it’s a challenge to get people to delay claiming. But Spend Safely aims to get over this hurdle with a strategy to generate income in your sixties without Social Security: Pull the amount from your portfolio each year that you would have received from Social Security had you claimed benefits. (If you’re earning money from a part-time job, that will reduce the amount you will need to pull out.) On top of that, withdraw an amount at a rate modeled after the required minimum distributions that older savers must take from tax-deferred accounts after age 70½. This Spend Safely rate starts at 2.7% of the year-end portfolio balance at age 60 and gradually raises that to 3.6% at 70. Thereafter, you would use the RMD withdrawal rates published by the IRS.

Vernon says retirees can tweak this method, say, to boost their travel budget in the early years, although that would mean reducing withdrawals later. One drawback: Annual withdrawals will go up and down with the investment portfolio’s performance each year.